Capitalism, globalism, and alterglobalism are manifestations of a shared cosmopolitan project

Main Article Content

Javier Mauricio Labrador Vega
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1065-067X

Abstract

The end of the Cold War marked a historic turning point from which Western hegemony was established around capitalism, liberal democracy, and human rights. The contemporary global landscape, marked by the reorganization of economic power, the emergence of transnational actors, and the fragmentation of identity, shows a structural transformation in the way power is exercised.
The concept of governance is evolving as a political solution that displaces the nation-state as the center of authority, promoting a post-sovereign and polycentric management model in which multilateral organizations, corporations, and non-governmental organizations (NGOS)
exercise regulatory functions through forms of participation that differ from traditional democracy.
NGOS, in particular, act as technologies of power that mediate between social demands and institutional structures, embodying a novel regulatory apparatus based on efficiency.
The article examines this logic, focusing on the incorporation of market criteria in public decision-making, the standardization of policies through indicators, and the subordination of the state to external regulatory frameworks. Rather than adopting an ideological stance against the model, it presents a fundamental question: does governance represent a threat to democratic sovereignty or a functional evolution in the face of growing global economic complexity? 

References

Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. https://dn790003.ca.archive.org/0/items/in.ernet. dli.2015.190485/2015.190485.The-Functions-Of-The-Executive.pdf

Chomsky, N. (2024). Hegemonía o supervivencia: La búsqueda de América por el dominio global. Haymarket Books.

De Benoist, A. (2019). Rebelión en la aldea global. Nomos.

Foucault, M. (2007). El nacimiento de la biopolítica: Curso del Collège de France (1978–1979). Paidós.

Fukuyama, F. (1992). El fin de la historia y el último hombre. Tusquets Editores.

Habermas, J. (1998). La constelación posnacional: Ensayos políticos. Paidós.

Huntington, S. P. (1996). El choque de civilizaciones y la reconfiguración del orden mundial. Paidós.

Meernik, J., Aloisi, R., Sowell, M. y Nichols, A. (2012). The impact of human rights organizations on naming and shaming campaigns. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002711431416

OCDE. (2018). Integridad para el buen gobierno en América Latina y el Caribe: De los compromisos a la acción. ocde Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307339-es

Razo, S. M. (2016). La vulnerabilidad económica y su interacción con el naming and shaming en la promoción de derechos humanos. http://hdl.handle.net/11651/1681

World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2017a). Guía del ceo para la economía circular. https://docs.wbcsd.org/2017/06/CEO_Guide_CE_ESP.pdf

World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2017b). Guía del ceo para los ods. https://sdghub.com/wpcontent/uploads/2017/10/CEO_Guide_to_the_SDGs_SPA.pdf

World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2021). Visión 2050: El momento de la transformación. https://perusostenible.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WBCSD_Vision2050TTT_Spanish.pdf

Zinoviev, A. (1999). La grande rupture: Sociologie d’un monde bouleversé. L’Age d’Homme.