Commenting on Ruling STC9311-2024: Expected Support for Appeals of Rulings

Main Article Content

Jorge Andrés Paez Quiñones
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8671-1310

Abstract

In the context of ordinary appeals, the appeal represents a means of challenge, providing the chance for a higher court to review potential first-instance errors. With the enactment of the 1991 Constitution, the guarantee of double instance has attained constitutional and even conventional significance.
This is an analysis of Ruling STC9311-2024, issued by the Supreme Court of Justice in its Civil Cassation Chamber, in which a tutela action is decided. In this ruling, the Court changes its position on procedural opportunity to support the appeal, denying prior support. This analysis evaluates the limited relevance of this judicial decision and offers constructive criticism, as it is deemed inconsistent with principles such as effective judicial protection and procedural economy. 

References

Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sentencia STC9311-2024. M. P. Fernando Augusto Jiménez Valderrama. 24 de mayo de 2021. https://tinyurl.com/mr4dzmun

Ley 2213 de 2022. Por la cual se establece la vigencia permanente del Decreto legislativo 806 de 2020 y se adoptan medidas para implementar las tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en las actuaciones judiciales, agilizar los procesos judiciales y flexibilizar la atención a los usuarios del servicio de justicia y se dictan otras disposiciones. 13 de junio de 2002. D.O. 56.064 https://tinyurl.com/4ev482te