Iusphilosophical Paradigms as Theoretical Guides in Law and Justice Discourse
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors keep the copyright and accept the publication of the contents in the journal Dos mil tres mil under the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. When authors submit their manuscript, it is assumed that they know and accept the terms of open access and the license used, that they allow publication in this journal and the disclosure of the work.
Authors are allowed to re-use published works, ie post-print may be archived for non-publication purposes Commercial, including their deposit in institutional repositories, thematic or personal web pages. Reproduction in other print or electronic media must include an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and its initial publication in the Journal.
Downloads
Altmetrics
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Philosophy of Law has delineated its trajectories through debates concerning the very nature of law and its interactions with other normative systems. This has involved addressing the tensions arising from ontological, epistemological, and ethical aspects (Alexy, 2008) throughout the history
of law. In the ethical dimension, one of these debates focuses on the relationship between law and justice, a tension that has decisively influenced both the concept and practice of law. This is an attempt to delineate a path regarding the state of the problem and to strengthen students’ critical thinking skills and their ability to find a connection between philosophy, law and the paradigm of
justice.
References
Alexy, R. (2008). *The Concept and Nature of Law*. Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons.
Alexy, R. (2016). *The Dual Nature of Law*. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Atienza, M. (2005). *The Reasons for Law: Theories of Legal Argumentation*. Mexico City: UNAM.
Atienza, M. (2017). *Legal Philosophy and Social Transformation*. Madrid: Trotta.
Dworkin, R. (2008). *Law’s Empire*. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2006). *Redistribution or Recognition?* Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
García Amado, J. A. (2023). *Legal Argumentation: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Elements*. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Habermas, J. (2010). *Facticity and Validity: On Law and the Democratic State in Terms of Discourse Theory* (6th ed.). (M. Jiménez Redondo, Trans.) Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Hart, H. (1961). *The Concept of Law* (3rd ed. 2012). (G. Carrió, Trans.) Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot.
Honneth, A. (2014). *The Right to Freedom*. Buenos Aires: Katz Editores.
Kelsen, H. (1934). *Pure Theory of Law* (1st ed.). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Kuhn, T. (1971). *The Structure of Scientific Revolutions*. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Mejía Quintana, O. (2016). *Consensual Theory of Law: Law as Public Deliberation*. Bogotá D.C.: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Radbruch, G. (2007). *Philosophy of Law*. Madrid: Reus.
Rawls, J. (2012). *A Theory of Justice*. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Ruthers, B. (2016). *Degenerate Law: Legal Theory and Chamber Jurists in the Third Reich*. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Welzel, H. (2011). *Introduction to Legal Philosophy: Natural Law and Justice*. Montevideo: B de F.